By John Losee
Designed for first-time readers of the topic, this stimulating advent deals a historic exposition of differing perspectives at the philosophy of technology. With concise profiles providing the main philosophers whose contributions are mentioned during this booklet, Losee explores the long-argued questions raised via philosophers and scientists in regards to the right evaluate of technology. This new version accommodates modern advancements within the self-discipline, together with contemporary paintings on theory-appraisal, experimental perform, the controversy over medical realism, and the philosophy of biology. Taking a balanced and informative technique, this paintings is the correct introductory quantity.
Read or Download A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (OPUS) PDF
Best history & philosophy books
This index quantity presents easy access to the main authoritative compilation of records and data relating Einstein's paintings and correspondence for the 1st 1/2 his existence. It bargains readers a Cumulative Index to the 1st ten volumes of the gathered papers, the 1st entire bibliography of Einstein's medical and nonscientific writings till 1921, and a succinct biographical time line.
The historical past of technology is one in every of wisdom being handed from group to group over hundreds of thousands of years, and this is often the vintage account of the main influential of those hobbies -- how Hellenistic technology handed to the Arabs the place it took on a brand new existence and ended in the advance of Arab astronomy and drugs, which flourished within the courts of the Muslim international and later handed directly to medieval Europe.
This e-book stories the stream of social wisdom by way of concentrating on the reception of Niklas Luhmann's structures concept in Hispanic the US. It exhibits that theories want lively involvement from students within the receiving box so as to trip.
Introducing the Enlightenment is the basic advisor to the giants of the Enlightenment—Adam Smith, Samuel Johnson, Immanuel Kant, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson. This e-book presents a transparent and obtainable advent to the best thinkers of the age, the lads and girls who believed that rational endeavour may possibly show the secrets and techniques of the universe.
- Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 4: Physics and Physical Technology, Part 3: Civil Engineering and Nautics
- Philosophy of chemistry : growth of a new discipline
- How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic
- Electromagnetic theory, vol. 1
- Roots of Modern Technology: An Elegant Survey of the Basic Mathematical and Scientific Concepts
- A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology
Extra resources for A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (OPUS)
Paradoxically, Duns Scotus both augmented the Method of Resolution and undercut conﬁdence in inductively established correlations. His theological convictions were responsible for the latter emphasis. He insisted that God can accomplish anything which does not involve a contradiction, and that uniformities in nature exist only by the forbearance of God. Moreover, God could, if He wished, short-circuit a regularity and produce an eﬀect directly without the presence of the usual cause. It was for this reason that Duns Scotus held that the Method of Agreement can establish only aptitudinal unions within experience.
Crombie, Robert Grosseteste, –. , III. –, in Ockham Studies and Selections, trans. and ed. S. C. , ), –. 19 Duns Scotus: Philosophical Writings, –. 20 Nicolaus of Autrecourt, ‘Second Letter to Bernard of Arezzo’, in Medieval Philosophy, ed. H. Shapiro (New York: The Modern Library, ), –. 21 J. R. Weinberg, Nicolaus of Autrecourt (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, ), . 22 Ibid. –. 6 The Debate over Saving the Appearances Osiander on Mathematical Models and Physical Truth 40 Copernicus’s Pythagorean Commitment 40 Bellarmine v.
This tradition often was reinforced by the ontological claim that the phenomenal realm is at best an “imitation” or “reﬂection” of the “real world”. Primary responsibility for promulgating this point of view rests with Plato and his interpreters. This dualism had important repercussions in the thought of Galileo and Descartes. Notes T. L. ), The Works of Archimedes (New York: Dover Publications, ), –. 2 Ibid. –. 1 4 Atomism and the Concept of Underlying Mechanism As noted above, some followers of Plato construed the world to be an imperfect reﬂection of an underlying reality.